Table of Contents

1 Introduction 1

1.1 Background 1

1.2 Propose of this Report 2

1.3 Structure of the Report 2

2 AIR QUALITY 8

2.1 Introduction 8

2.2 Monitoring Locations 8

2.3 Monitoring Equipment 8

2.4 Monitoring Methodology 9

2.5 Monitoring Result 11

2.6 Action and Limit Levels 11

2.7 Event and Action Plan for Air Quality 11

3 ECOLOGY 14

3.1 Introduction 14

3.2 Baseline Walkover Survey 14

3.3 Baseline Translocation Works - Pitcher Plant 15

4 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL ASSESSMENT 17

4.1 Introduction 17

4.2 Baseline Monitoring 17

4.3 Event and Action Plan 24

5 CULTURAL HERITAGE 25

5.1 Introduction 25

5.2 Baseline Monitoring 25

5.3 Condition Survey Findings 25

5.4 Existing Condition 26

5.5 Event and Action Plan 29

6 COnclusions 31

List of Figures

Figure 1.1 Layout Plan of the Contract

Figure 1.2 Various Contracts of TM-CLKL

Figure 1.3 Site Boundary of HY/2013/12 - Northern Connection Toll Plaza and Associated Works “The Contract”

Figure 1.4 Site Boundary HY/2012/07, TMCLKL – Southern Connection Viaduct Section “Contract 1”

Figure 1.5 Site Boundary HY/2012/08, TMCLKL – Northern Connection Sub-sea tunnel Section “Contract 2”

Figure 2.1 Location Map of Air Quality Monitoring Location

Figure 5.1 Location of the Grave G1

Figure 5.2 General View of the Grave G1

Figure 5.3 Existing Cracks of the Grave G1

List of TABLES

Table 2.1 Monitoring Frequency and Parameter of Air Quality Monitoring Stations

Table 2.2 Air Quality Monitoring Equipment

Table 2.3 TSP Action and Limit Levels for Impact Air Quality Monitoring

Table 2.4 Event / Action Plan for Air Quality

Table 3 Pitcher Plant Numbers and Health Condition Recorded in the Site in September 2013

Table 4.1 Baseline Result for Landscape and Visual Impact

Table 4.2 Event and Action Plan for Landscape and Visual Impact

Table 4.3 Proposed Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures

Table 4.4 Event and Action Plan for Landscape and Visual Impact

Table 5.1 Crack width and Photographic record of the Grave G1

Table 5.2 Event / Action Plan for Cultural Heritage

List of Appendices

Appendix A Construction Programme

Appendix B Habitat Map of Tuen Mun

Appendix C Location of Pitcher Plant

Appendix D Photographic Record of Baseline Condition for Landscape and Visual

Appendix E Key Plan of Landscape and Visual Resource

2 AIR QUALITY

2.1 Introduction

2.1.1.1 Baseline air quality monitoring has been conducted by the ET of HyD Contract HY/2012/08 between 17 and 31 October 2013 and the associated baseline report has been submitted to the EPD for approval. It is agreed amongst by the Contractor, RE, IEC that this Contract could make use of the baseline monitoring data collected by the ET under HY/2012/08 and therefore no baseline monitoring is required under this Contract.

2.2 Monitoring Locations

2.2.1.1 The monitoring stations for baseline air quality monitoring are shown Figure 2.1. Monitoring parameter, monitoring period and frequency are summarized in Table 2.1.

Table 2.1 Monitoring Frequency and Parameter of Air Quality Monitoring Stations

Air quality monitoring station	Location	Landuse	No. of Storey	Parameter	Period	Frequency
ASR1	Tuen Mun Fireboat Station	Office	1	1-hour TSP 24-hour TSP	07:00-19:00 for 1-hour TSP 24 hours for 24-hour TSP	3 times / day for 1-hour TSP Daily for 24-hour TSP
ASR5	Pillar Point Fire Station	Office	5
AQMS1	Previous River Trade Golf	Bare ground	0
ASR6	Butterfly Beach Laundry	Commercial	0
ASR10	Butterfly Beach Park	Recreational uses	0

2.3 Monitoring Equipment

2.3.1.1 High Volume Samplers (HVS) were used to carry out 24-hour TSP monitoring. Direct reading dust meter were also used to measure 1-hour average TSP levels. The 1-hour sampling was determined periodically by HVS to check the validity and accuracy of the results measured by direct reading method.

2.3.1.2 Wind data monitoring equipment was set at rooftop of ASR5 (Pillar Point Fire Station) for logging wind speed and wind direction such that the wind sensors are clear of obstructions or turbulence caused by building. The wind data monitoring equipment is recalibrated at least once every six months and the wind directions are divided into 16 sectors of 22.5 degrees each.

2.3.1.3 Table 2.2 summarizes the equipment used in the baseline air quality monitoring programme.

Table 2.2 Air Quality Monitoring Equipment

Equipment	Model and Make
HVS Sampler	GMWS-2310 ACCU-VOL
Calibrator	CM-AIR-43 (S/N 9833620)
1-hour TSP Dust Meter	Sibata LD-3B
Wind Anemometer	MetPak, WindSonic

2.4 Monitoring Methodology

24-hour TSP

Instrumentation

2.4.1.1 High volume Samplers (HVS) completed with appropriate sampling inlets were employed for air quality monitoring. Each sampler was composed of a motor, a filter holder, a flow controller and a sampling inlet and its performance specification complies with that required by USEPA Standard Title 40, Code of Federation Regulations Chapter 1 (Part 50).

HVS Installation

2.4.1.2 The following guidelines were adopted during the installation of HVS:

Ÿ Sufficient support was provided to secure the samplers against gusty wind.

Ÿ No two samplers were placed less than 2 meters apart.

Ÿ The distance between the sampler and an obstacle, such as buildings, was at least twice the height that the obstacle protrudes above the sampler.

Ÿ A minimum of 2 meters of separation from walls, parapets and penthouses was required for rooftop samples.

Ÿ A minimum of 2 meters separation from any supporting structure, measured horizontally was required.

Ÿ No furnaces or incineration flues were nearby.

Ÿ Airflow around the sampler was unrestricted.

The samplers were more than 20 meters from the drip line.

Ÿ Any wire fence and gate, to protect the sampler, should not cause any obstruction during monitoring.

Filter Preparation

2.4.1.3 Fiberglass filters were used [Note: these filters have a collection efficiency of larger than 99% for particles of 0.3μm diameter]. A HOKLAS accredited laboratory was responsible for the preparation of 24-hr conditioned and preweighed filter papers for monitoring team.

2.4.1.4 All prepared filters were equilibrated in the conditioning environment for 24 hours before weighing. The conditioning environment temperature was around 25 °C and not variable by more than ±3 °C; the relative humidity (RH) was <50% and not variable by more than ±5%. A convenient working RH was 40%.

Operating/ Analytical Procedures

2.4.1.5 Operating/analytical procedures for the air quality monitoring were highlighted as follows:

Ÿ Prior to the commencement of the dust sampling, the flow rate of the HVS was properly set (between 1.1 m3/min. and 1.4 m3/min.) in accordance with the manufacturer's instruction to within the range recommended in USEPA Standard Title 40, CFR Part 50.

Ÿ The power supply was checked to ensure the sampler worked properly.

Ÿ On sampling, the sampler was operated for 5 minutes to establish thermal equilibrium before placing any filter media at the designated air quality monitoring station.

Ÿ The filter holding frame was then removed by loosening the four nuts and carefully a weighted and conditioned filter was centered with the stamped number upwards, on a supporting screen.

Ÿ The filter was aligned on the screen so that the gasket formed an airtight seal on the outer edges of the filter. Then the filter holding frame was tightened to the filter holder with swing bolts. The applied pressure should be sufficient to avoid air leakage at the edges.

Ÿ The shelter lid was closed and secured with the aluminum strip.

Ÿ The timer was then programmed. Information was recorded on the record sheet, which included the starting time, the weather condition and the filter number (the initial weight of the filter paper can be found out by using the filter number).

Ÿ After sampling, the filter was removed and sent to the laboratory for weighing. The elapsed time was also recorded.

Ÿ Before weighing, all filters were equilibrated in a conditioning environment for 24 hours. The conditioning environment temperature should be between 25°C and 30°C and not vary by more than ±3°C; the relative humidity (RH) should be < 50% and not vary by more than ±5%. A convenient working RH is 40%. Weighing results were used for further analysis of TSP concentrations collected by each filter.

Maintenance and Calibration

2.4.1.6 The following maintenance/calibration was required for the HVS:

Ÿ The high volume motors and their accessories were properly maintained. Appropriate maintenance such as routine motor brushes replacement and electrical wiring checking were made to ensure that the equipment and necessary power supply are in good working condition.

Ÿ All HVS were calibrated (five point calibration) using Calibration Kit prior to the commencement of the baseline monitoring and thereafter at bi-monthly intervals.

1-hour TSP

Measuring Procedures

2.4.1.7 The measuring procedures of the 1-hour dust meter are in accordance with the Manufacturer’s Instruction Manual as follows:

Ÿ The 1-hour dust meter is placed at least 1.3 meters above ground.

Ÿ Set POWER to “ON” and make sure that the battery level was not flash or in low level.

Ÿ Allow the instrument to stand for about 3 minutes and then the cap of the air sampling inlet has been released.

Ÿ Push the knob at MEASURE position.

Ÿ Set time/mode setting to [BG] by pushing the time setting switch. Then, start the background measurement by pushing the start/stop switch once. It will take 6 sec. to complete the background measurement.

Ÿ Push the time setting switch to change the time setting display to [MANUAL] at the bottom left of the liquid crystal display. Finally, push the start/stop switch to stop the measuring after 1 hour sampling.

Ÿ Information such as sampling date, time, count value and site condition were recorded during the monitoring period.

Maintenance and Calibration

2.4.1.8 The following maintenance/calibration is required for the 1-hour dust meter;

Ÿ Check and calibrate the meter by HVS to check the validity and accuracy of the results measured by direct reading method at 2-month intervals throughout all stages of the air quality monitoring.

2.5 Monitoring Result

2.5.1.1 The monitoring results, name of laboratory and calibration details, and QA/QC results and detection limits to be referred to the Baseline Monitoring Report under the Contract HY/2012/08.

2.6 Action and Limit Levels

2.6.1.1 The baseline monitoring results formed the basis for determining the air quality criteria for the impact monitoring. The ET shall compare the impact monitoring results with air quality criteria set up for 24-hour TSP and 1-hour TSP. Based on results of the approved Baseline Monitoring Report of HyD Contract HY/2012/08, the proposed Action and Limit Levels are shown in Tables 2.3.

Table 2.3 TSP Action and Limit Levels for Impact Air Quality Monitoring

Parameters	Air Quality Monitoring Stations	Action Level (μg/m³)	Limit Level (μg/m³)
24 hour TSP (μg/m³)	ASR1	213	260
	ASR5	238	260
	AQMS1	213	260
	ASR6	238	260
	ASR10	214	260
1 hour TSP (μg/m³)	ASR1	331	500
	ASR5	340	500
	AQMS1	335	500
	ASR6	338	500
	ASR10	337	500

2.7 Event and Action Plan for Air Quality

2.7.1.1 In case of non-compliance with the air quality criteria, more frequent monitoring exercise shall be conducted within 24 hours after the result is obtained. This additional monitoring shall be continued until the excessive dust emission or the deterioration in air quality is rectified. The Event/Action Plan for air quality is given in the attached Table 2.4.

3 ECOLOGY

3.1 Introduction

3.1.1.1 Ecological baseline EM&A will consist of undertaking the following:

Ÿ a walk-over survey, prior to construction works, of the land and streams where works will be undertaken. It may be necessary to rope off and protect specific habitats or species of special interest identified during the ecological surveys

3.2 Baseline Walkover Survey

3.2.1.1 The purpose of the walk over survey will be to confirm the existing ecological conditions, with reference to the habitat maps included in the EIA Report and the established baseline conditions, in relation to the extent and condition of the habitats and species noted during the walkover survey. No detailed ecological surveys of flora and fauna will be required at this stage.

3.2.1.2 Baseline ecological walkover was conducted on 22 September 2014 and the results are presented in below.

Observations

3.2.1.3 Two major landscapes within the study area were tall shrubland and plantation according to the habitat map in the approved EIA Report. To better record specific species of native trees and shrubland, a general record about their habit of growth was made.

Tall Shrubland

3.2.1.4 Shrubland habitat is densely populated with a mix native tree shrubby plant species within study area. Native tree like Acacia confuse as well as other shrubby plant species are planted broadly in this area. Shrublands are widely distributed. The most common one are the Acacia confusa, Leucaena leucocephala, Macaranga tanarius and Clausena lansium. They have mixed with each other and get better greening benefit. No significant change to habitat maps in the EIA Report was observed.

Plantation

3.2.1.5 Plantation at the study area contain mainly roadside plantation for landscape use within the study area. The plantation part, trees, for instance, Ficus microcarpa and Ficus elastica are most widely used as roadside (riverside) plant and landscape greening. They are common evergreen trees in Hong Kong and can grow as tall as fifteen meters which are considered to be very aggressive. No significant change to habitat maps in the EIA Report was observed.

Stream

3.2.1.6 The outlet of the stream opposite to the River Trade Terminal is now modified to an artificial culvert. Other than that, the habitat types within the Study area are similar to the habitat maps in the EIA report.

Developed Area

3.2.1.7 The developed area such as warehouses and River Trade Terminal was observed. No significant change to habitat maps in the EIA Report was observed.

Sandy beach

3.2.1.8 Part of the Butterfly Beach as designated in EIA, is located at the eastern side of the pillar point. No significant change to habitat maps in the EIA Report was observed.

3.2.1.9 The habitat map of Tuen Mun is shown in Appendix B.

3.3 Baseline Translocation Works - Pitcher Plant

3.3.1.1 During the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Stage of the TM-CLKL (which was approved on 23 October 2009), no Pitcher Plant (Nepenthes mirabilis) was identified within the proposed works area of the toll plaza. It was believed that the Pitcher Plant area identified would not be directly impacted by the toll plaza works and the only mitigation measures required were to install hoarding at the perimeter of the proposed works area to avoid encroachment into the Pitcher Plant area. However, during an ecology survey for the TMWB EIA in late 2011, Pitcher Plant was identified within the proposed works area for the TM-CLKL toll plaza. Pitcher Plant is protected under the Forestry Regulations (subsidiary legislation of the Forests and Countryside Ordinance, Cap. 96) and the Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586). Discussion with Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) (27 October 2012) has confirmed that if the TM-CLKL project was to impact the Pitcher Plant area that further mitigation measures for the Pitcher Plant would be required under the TM-CLKL project. As such, the project proponent Highways Department (HyD) has appointed AECOM to undertake baseline survey and propose a transplantation strategy for Pitcher Plant to be affected by the proposed TM-CLKL project.

3.3.1.2 A baseline Pitcher Plant survey was conducted in September 2013 by a suitably qualified ecologist. The aim of the survey was to update, identify and record the location, number, health condition (i.e. good, fair, or poor), and suitability for transplantation of the affected individuals in order to provide details for the transplantation exercise. Each identified individual was tagged. The habitats present and representative plant species were recorded.

3.3.1.3 The assessment area included the slope above the toll plaza on which the Pitcher Plant populations have been previously identified. The slope was surveyed to identify the extent of the Pitcher Plant populations particularly those that occur within and adjacent to the proposed works site.

Baseline Results on September 2013

3.3.1.4 The south-facing slope above the proposed toll plaza supports a mosaic of shrubland, rocky slope, plantation and watercourse habitats. Pitcher Plant was recorded in the rocky slope, shrubland and watercourse habitats. The rocky slope habitat comprised some exposed boulders and bare ground; however, much of it has been naturally regenerated by shrubland species such as Dichotomy Forked Fern (Dicranopteris pedata), with some encroachment by scattered Brisbane Box (Lophostemon confertus) saplings from the adjacent plantation habitat. This habitat supported a Pitcher Plant population (see Zones 1-7 in Appendix C) of approximately 0.5 ha in size and 259 Pitcher Plants (see Appendix C, Plates 1-3)).

3.3.1.5 In addition, three small areas (see Zones 8 – 10 in Appendix C) of Pitcher Plant were recorded along the watercourse in the shrubland habitat (see Appendix C, Plate 4). The watercourse comprised a narrow, shallow flow over bedrock with occasional small, very shallow pooled areas. There is evidence that part of the flow is being diverted for human use. Riparian vegetation comprised the shrubland habitat in which the watercourse flowed. Abundant tree/shrub species found in the shrubland habitat included Dwarf Mountain Pine (Baeckea frutescens), Pop-gun Seed (Bridelia tomentosa), Eurya spp., Hong Kong Gordonia (Gordonia axillaris), Pond Spice (Litsea glutinosa), Pines (Pinus spp.), Wild Coffee (Psychotria asiatica), Rose Myrtle (Rhodomyrtus tomentosa), Hedge Sageretia (Sageretia thea), and Brisbane Box (Lophostemon confertus). While the understorey was dominated by Dichotomy Forked Fern (Dicranopteris pedata), with frequent Greenbrier (Smilax china), and occasional Hainan Galangal (Alpinia hainanensis), Oriental Blechnum (Blechnum orientale), Bentham’s Rosewood (Dalbergia benthami), Dianella (Dianella ensifolia), and Chinese Silvergrass (Miscanthus sinensis).

3.3.1.6 The health and condition of the Pitcher Plant individuals was assessed and each plant was assessed, tagged and photographed by Pegasus Greenland Ltd.. All plants were assessed as being in “fair” health condition as summarized in Table 3. As the plants mostly grew on rock faces with thin soils, the successful removal and transport of the existing individuals is likely to be challenging given the weak nature of the plant’s roots.

Table 3 Pitcher Plant Numbers and Health Condition Recorded in the Site in September 2013

Zone	No. of Plants Found	Health Condition
1	3	Fair
2	1	Fair
3	15	Fair
4	6	Fair
5	33	Fair
6	185	Fair
7	16	Fair
8	3	Fair
9	8	Fair
10	10	Fair
TOTAL	280

Baseline Results on September 2014

3.3.1.7 Before commencement of the construction of the Contract, the initial survey was conducted by Hong Kong Landscape in September 2014 to confirm the location and number of the affected Pitcher Plants by the proposed TM-CLKL project. During the initial survey in September 2014, a total of 280 nos. of individual Pitcher Plant located at Zone 1 to 7 was identified. They are occurring on the rocky slope habitat which will be impacted by the proposed slope works (Zone 1 to 7). Each identified individual were tagged and photographed. The location map of the pitcher plants is shown in Appendix C.

3.3.1.8 280 nos. of Pitcher Plants identified in the initial survey will require transplantation to minimize impacts to the population. For those unaffected Pitcher Plant in Zone 8 to 10, fencing or other physical barriers will be erected for protection.

3.3.1.9 A transplantation proposal for Pitcher Plant in Zone 1 to 7 was submitted to EPD and AFCD for agreement separately.

4 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL ASSESSMENT

4.1 Introduction

4.1.1.1 A one off survey shall be conducted prior to commencement of any construction works. A photographic record of the site at the time of the contractor’s possession of the site shall be prepared by the Contractor and approved by the ER.

4.2 Baseline Monitoring

4.2.1.1 Baseline walkover for the exiting landscape condition was conducted on 22 September 2014. During the baseline monitoring, apart from the temporary river trade golf at LR03 was demolished and abandoned, LR01 to LR07 were identified as same as the EIA study.

4.2.1.2 The photographic record and monitoring results are shown in Table 4.1 and 4.2. The proposed landscape and visual mitigation measures for construction and operation phase are listed in Table 4.3. Key plan showing the location and extent of existing landscape and visual resource is shown in Appendix E.

4.2.1.3 Moreover, a photographic record of baseline condition prepared by the RE was submitted to EPD on 29 September 2014 and the record is presented in Appendix D as supplementary information.

Observations

Table 4.1 Baseline Result for Landscape and Visual Impact

Existing Landscape Resources	Photographic record
Seawater body and shoreline near Pillar Point (LR01)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2012/08, TMCLKL – Northern Connection Sub-sea tunnel Section Contract.
Plantation within the industrial area and sewage treatment plant at Pillar Point (LR02)
Temporary River Trade Golf (LR03)
Tall Shrubland (LR04)
Stream (LR05)
Plantation (LR06)
Sandy Beach (LR07)
Seawater body and shoreline north of Tai Ho Wan (LR08)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2012/07, TMCLKL – Southern Connection Viaduct Section contract.
Tai Ho Wan (LR09)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2012/07, TMCLKL – Southern Connection Viaduct Section contract.
Roadside planting along North Lantau Highway and within MTR Siu Ho Wan Depot (LR10)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2012/07, TMCLKL – Southern Connection Viaduct Section contract.
Vegetation at Tai Ho and Pak Mong (LR11)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2012/07, TMCLKL – Southern Connection Viaduct Section contract.
Stream course at Pak Mong (LR12)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2012/07, TMCLKL – Southern Connection Viaduct Section contract.
Pitcher Plant at future Toll Plaza area (Additional LR)
Siu Lang Shui Upland and Hillside Landscape (LCA01)
Pillar Point Miscellaneous Urban Fringe Landscape (LCA02)
Pillar Point Industrial Urban Landscape (LCA03)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2012/08, TMCLKL – Northern Connection Sub-sea tunnel Section Contract.
Inshore Water Landscape near Pillar Point (LCA04)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2012/08, TMCLKL – Northern Connection Sub-sea tunnel Section Contract.
North Lantau Transportation Corridor Landscape (LCA05)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2012/07, TMCLKL – Southern Connection Viaduct Section contract.
Tai Ho Upland and Hillside Landscape (LCA06)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2012/07, TMCLKL – Southern Connection Viaduct Section contract.
Tai Ho Settled Valley Landscape (LCA07)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2012/07, TMCLKL – Southern Connection Viaduct Section contract.
Pak Mong Upland and Hillside Landscape (LCA08)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2012/07, TMCLKL – Southern Connection Viaduct Section contract.
Inshore Water Landscape near Tai Ho (LCA09)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2012/07, TMCLKL – Southern Connection Viaduct Section contract.

Table 4.2 Baseline Result for Landscape Resources and Landscape Character Areas

Existing Landscape Resources	Baseline Condition	Description of Impacts	Remedial Works
Seawater body and shoreline near Pillar Point (LR01)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2012/08, TMCLKL – Northern Connection Sub-sea tunnel Section Contract.
Plantation within the industrial area and sewage treatment plant at Pillar Point (LR02)	Plantation within the industrial area and sewage treatment plant at Pillar Point There are approximately 240 trees at this developed industrial site. The trees are of small to medium size (height: 3-12m, spread: 2-6m, trunk diameter: 95-400mm) and of low to medium amenity value.	· approximately 140 no. of trees will be affected, of which approximately 2 no. of trees are proposed to be transplanted, approximately 10 no. of trees are proposed to be felled, approximately 130 no. of weed trees (Leucaena leucocephala) are proposed to be removed. · felled trees are mainly Acacia confusa of low amenity value.	CM1, CM2, CM9, CM10 and OM4
Temporary River Trade Golf (LR03)	Abandon River Trade Golf The Abandon River Trade Golf is classified as developed area. There are 50 Acacia confusa, Caryota ochlandra of medium size and of low to medium amenity value. Due to the artificial and temporary nature, the sensitivity of this landscape resource is considered as medium.	· Abandoned River Trade Golf and will be permanently lost	CM1, CM2, CM9, CM10 and OM4
Tall Shrubland (LR04)	Tall shrubland and disturbed hillside plantation area at Pillar Point The area consists of tall shrubland and disturbed hillside plantation. There are more than 3000 trees and tall shrubs on the slope and plantation. The trees are mostly of low to medium size together with approximately 20 mature trees (height: 2-16m, spread: 0.5-10m, trunk diameter: 95-820mm) and of small to medium amenity value.	· approximately 2600 no. of trees will be affected, of which approximately 2300 no. of trees are proposed to be felled, approximately 300 no. of weed trees (Leucaena leucocephala) are proposed to be removed. · felled trees are mainly Acacia confusa, Casuarina equisetifolia, Clausena lansium, Dimocarpus longan, Eucalyptus torelliana, Litchi chinensis, Lophostemon confertus, Macaranga tanarius. The trees are of low to medium amenity value · approximately 4.2ha tall shrubland will be lost permanently	CM1, CM2, CM9, CM10 and OM1
Stream (LR05)	Stream course at Pillar Point The small stream is partly artificial and partly natural. There are several patches of Rhododendron simsii near the stream.	· N.A.	CM7
Plantation (LR06)	Roadside planting along Lung Mun Road There are approximately 600 trees along the roadside. The trees are of medium size (height: 1.5-13m, spread: 0.5-8m, trunk diameter: 95-760mm) and of low to medium amenity value.	· approximately 260 no. of trees will be affected, of which approximately 20 no. of trees are proposed to be transplanted, approximately 200 no. of trees are proposed to be felled, approximately 40 no. of weed trees (Leucaena leucocephala) are proposed to be removed. · felled trees are mainly Acacia confusa of low amenity value.	CM1, CM2, CM9, CM10 and OM4
Sandy Beach (LR07)	None	· N.A.	Nil
Seawater body and shoreline north of Tai Ho Wan (LR08)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2010/02, HKBCF – Reclamation Works contract.
Tai Ho Wan (LR09)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2010/02, HKBCF – Reclamation Works contract.
Roadside planting along North Lantau Highway and within MTR Siu Ho Wan Depot (LR10)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2010/02, HKBCF – Reclamation Works contract.
Vegetation at Tai Ho and Pak Mong (LR11)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2012/07, TMCLKL – Southern Connection Viaduct Section contract.
Stream course at Pak Mong (LR12)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2012/07, TMCLKL – Southern Connection Viaduct Section contract.
Pitcher Plant (Additional LR)	Existing Pitcher Plant There are 280 pitcher plant within the construction area of the future toll plaza.	· The Construction of the future Toll Plaza underpass at Tuen Mun will affect the protected Pitcher Plant at that location. Therefore, it was proposed to transplant the affected Pitcher Plant.	Pitcher Plant unavoidably affected by the works shall be transplanted subject to the approval of AFCD and EPD. The transplantation works should strictly comply with the condition as stipulated in the license issued by AFCD and the VEP issued by EPD.
Siu Lang Shui Upland and Hillside Landscape (LCA01)	Siu Lang Shui Upland and Hillside Landscape This is upland and hillside lie above 40mPD and below 300mPD in which part of the area is former landfill site. The area is dominated with tall shrubland and plantation of medium amenity value. The area is predominantly undeveloped with occasional small buildings.	· Toll plaza, slope works and retaining walls are incompatible to undisturbed hillside landscape. More than 1000 trees and approximately 4.2ha tall shrubland will be lost permanently, leading to change in landscape quality	CM1, CM2, CM9, CM10, OM1
Pillar Point Miscellaneous Urban Fringe Landscape (LCA02)	Pillar Point Miscellaneous Urban Fringe Landscape The generally low rise developments within the area are of mixed land uses, including typically highways, transportation, storage, parks, residential sites and undeveloped land (hillside). The area is located at the edge of urbanized area.	· Toll plaza, slope works and retaining walls are not incompatible to miscellaneous urban fringe landscape which consisted of mixed land uses such as highways, transportation. More than 1000 will be lost permanently, leading to change in landscape quality	CM1, CM2, CM9, CM10 and OM1
Pillar Point Industrial Urban Landscape (LCA03)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2012/08, TMCLKL – Northern Connection Sub-sea tunnel Section Contract.
Inshore Water Landscape near Pillar Point (LCA04)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2012/08, TMCLKL – Northern Connection Sub-sea tunnel Section Contract.
North Lantau Transportation Corridor Landscape (LCA05)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2012/07, TMCLKL – Southern Connection Viaduct Section contract.
Tai Ho Upland and Hillside Landscape (LCA06)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2012/07, TMCLKL – Southern Connection Viaduct Section contract.
Tai Ho Settled Valley Landscape (LCA07)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2012/07, TMCLKL – Southern Connection Viaduct Section contract.
Pak Mong Upland and Hillside Landscape (LCA08)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2012/07, TMCLKL – Southern Connection Viaduct Section contract.
Inshore Water Landscape near Tai Ho (LCA09)	This landscape resources only covered in HY/2012/07, TMCLKL – Southern Connection Viaduct Section contract.

Table 4.3 Proposed Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures

ID No.	Construction Phase Mitigation Measures
CM1	Existing trees on boundary of the Project Area shall be carefully protected during construction. Detailed Tree Protection Specification shall be provided in the Contract Specification. Under this specification, the Contractor shall be required to submit, for approval, a detailed working method statement for the protection of trees prior to undertaking any works adjacent to all retained trees, including trees in contractor’s works areas. (Tree protection measures will be detailed at Tree Removal Application stage).
CM2	Trees unavoidably affected by the works shall be transplanted where practical. Trees will be transplanted straight to their final receptor site and not held in a temporary nursery. A detailed Tree Transplanting Specification shall be provided in the Contract Specification. Sufficient time for necessary tree root and crown preparation periods shall be allowed in the project programme.
CM3	Hillside and roadside screen planting to proposed roads, associated structures and slope works.
CM4	Hydroseeding or sheeting of soil stockpiles with visually unobtrusive material (in earth tone).
CM5	Screening of construction works by hoardings around works area in visually unobtrusive colours, to screen works.
CM6	Control night-time lighting and glare by hooding all lights.
CM7	Ensure no run-off into water body adjacent to the Project Area.
CM8	Avoidance of excessive height and bulk of buildings and structures.
CM9	Recycle/Reuse all felled trees and vegetation practicable, e.g. mulching
CM10	Compensatory tree planting shall be provided to the satisfaction of relevant Government departments. Required numbers and locations of compensatory trees shall be determined and agreed separately with Government during the Tree Felling Application process under ETWBTC 3/2006
ID No.	Operation Phase Mitigation Measures
OM1	Re-vegetation of affected woodland/shrubland with native species.
OM2	Tall buffer screen tree / shrub / climber planting should be incorporated to soften hard engineering structures and facilities.
OM3	Streetscape elements (e.g. paving, signage, street furniture, lighting etc.) shall be sensitively designed in a manner that responds to the local context, and minimises potential negative landscape and visual impacts. Lighting units should be directional and minimise unnecessary light spill.
OM4	Structure, ornamental tree / shrub / climber planting should be provided along roadside amenity strips, central dividers and newly formed slopes to enhance the townscape quality and further greenery enhancement.
OM5	Aesthetically pleasing design (visually unobtrusive and non-reflective) as regard to the form, material and finishes shall be incorporated to all buildings, engineering structures and associated infrastructure facilities.
OM6	Avoidance of excessive height and bulk of buildings and structures

4.3 Event and Action Plan

4.3.1.1 Should non-compliance of the landscape and visual impacts occur, actions in accordance with the action plan stated in Table 4.2 should be carried out.

Table 4.4 Event and Action Plan for Landscape and Visual Impact

Event ACTION LEVEL	ACTION
Event ACTION LEVEL	ET	IEC	Permit Holder	Contractor
Design Check	Ÿ Check final design conforms to the requirements of EP and prepare report.	Ÿ Check report. Ÿ Recommend remedial design if necessary	Ÿ Undertake remedial design if necessary
Non- conformity on one occasion	Ÿ Identify Source Ÿ Inform IEC and Permit Holder Ÿ Discuss remedial actions with IEC, Permit Holder and Contractor Ÿ Monitor remedial actions until rectification has been completed	Ÿ Check report Ÿ Check Contractor's working method Ÿ Discuss with ET and Contractor on possible remedial measures Ÿ Advise Permit Holder on effectiveness of proposed remedial measures. Ÿ Check implementation of remedial measures	Ÿ Notify Contractor Ÿ Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented	Ÿ Amend working methods Ÿ Rectify damage and undertake any necessary replacement
Repeated Non- conformity	Ÿ Identify Source Ÿ Inform IEC and Permit Holder Ÿ Increase monitoring frequency Ÿ Discuss remedial actions with IEC, Permit Holder and Contractor Ÿ Monitor remedial actions until rectification has been completed Ÿ If nonconformity stops, cease additional monitoring	Ÿ Check monitoring report Ÿ Check Contractor's working method Ÿ Discuss with ET and Contractor on possible remedial measures Ÿ Advise Permit Holder on effectiveness of proposed remedial measures Ÿ Supervise implementation of remedial measures	Ÿ Notify Contractor Ÿ Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented	Ÿ Amend working methods Ÿ Rectify damage and undertake any necessary replacement

5 CULTURAL HERITAGE

5.1 Introduction

5.1.1.1 The EIA has recommended that EM&A for cultural heritage resources is undertaken during construction phase of the project. Implementation of the mitigation measures recommended by the EIA will be monitored through the site audit programme.

5.2 Baseline Monitoring

5.2.1.1 Prior to construction, a baseline survey of the grave G1 should be undertaken to establish the existing condition.

5.2.1.2 The purpose of the baseline condition survey was to record the existing condition of the grave and comprised the following task.

1. Identification of grave near the Project Site;

2. Carry out visual inspection for the condition survey;

3. Record the existing condition and evaluation of structural integrity of the grave;

4. Record the exact location of the grave prior to construction commencement. This information formed the baseline information for reference during construction phase;

5. Submission of all records such as photographs, grave locations, all detected cracks, defects and damage, if any.

5.3 Condition Survey Findings

5.3.1.1 The condition survey was conducted on 23 September 2014 and the finding area presented below.

5.3.1.2 The historical grave was identified during the EIA stage of the project and the location of the grave (G1) was shown in Figure 5.1. It was observed that plenty of bushes was grown around the grave. The general view of the grave was shown in Figure 5.2.

Figure 5.2 General View of the Grave G1

5.4 Existing Condition

5.4.1.1 The Grave G1 is generally in good condition. However, a total of 10 cracks ranged from hairline to 2.8mm were identified in the cement rendering and mortar of bricks of the grave. The location of the cracks are shown in Figure 5.3. Detailed information such as crack width and photographic record of the grave are summarized in Table 5.1.

Figure 5.3 Existing Cracks of the Grave G1

Table 5.1 Crack width and Photographic record of the Grave G1

Crack No.	Crack Width (mm)	Photographic Record
1	Hairline
2	1.2
3	1.5
4	1.0
5	Hairline
6	1.0
7	1.6
8	1.3-4.0
9	2.5-2.8
10	0.8-2.1

5.5 Event and Action Plan

5.5.1.1 All measures undertaken by the Contractor during the construction phase in the vicinity of the grave shall be audited by the Environmental Team (ET), on a regular basis to ensure compliance with the intended aims of the recommended mitigation measures. Site inspections should be undertaken at least once per week throughout the construction period adjacent to these properties. The main aim of the survey is prevention of any possible damage to the grave and to ensure that the proposed mitigation measures are implemented. The broad scope of the audit will involve supervision of the following:

Ÿ non-contact effects of the engineering works, such as vibration from pneumatic drills which could cause damage, such as foundation or wall cracks and loosening of tiles or fixtures; and

Ÿ contact between the historic structures and equipment and materials associated with the engineering works.

5.5.1.2 Specifically, the monitoring programme will entail the following tasks:

Ÿ the extent of the agreed works areas should be regularly checked during the construction phase to ensure the buffer with a minimum of 1.0m set back of the permanent structure and a minimum of 0.7m clearance from the grave, can be maintained during construction, and

Ÿ ensure no stockpiling or equipment storage is affecting the structures.

5.5.1.3 In the event of non-compliance the responsibilities of the relevant parties is detailed in the Event /Action plan provided on Table 5.2.

Table 5.2 Event / Action Plan for Cultural Heritage

Action Level	ET	IC (E)	ER	Contractor
Non- conformity on one occasion	1. Identify Source 2. Inform the IEC and the ER 3. Discuss remedial actions with the IEC, the ER and the Contractor 4. Monitor remedial actions until rectification has been completed	1. Check report 2. Check the Contractor's working method 3. Discuss with the ET and the Contractor on possible remedial measures 4. Advise the ER on effectiveness of proposed remedial measures. 5. Check implementation of remedial measures.	1. Notify Contractor 2. Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented	1. Amend working methods 2. Rectify damage and undertake any necessary replacement
Repeated Non- conformity	1. Identify Source 2. Inform the IC(E) and the ER 3. Increase monitoring frequency 4. Discuss remedial actions with the IC(E), the ER and the Contractor 5. Monitor remedial actions until rectification has been completed 6. If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring	1. Check monitoring report 2. Check the Contractor's working method 3. Discuss with the ES and the Contractor on possible remedial measures 4. Advise the ER on effectiveness of proposed remedial measures 5. Supervise implementation of remedial measures.	1. Notify the Contractor 2. Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented	1. Amend working methods 2. Rectify damage and undertake any necessary replacement

Action Level

IC (E)

Contractor

Non- conformity on one occasion

1. Identify Source

2. Inform the IEC and the ER

3. Discuss remedial actions with the IEC, the ER and the Contractor

4. Monitor remedial actions until rectification has been completed

1. Check report

2. Check the Contractor's working method

3. Discuss with the ET and the Contractor on possible remedial measures

4. Advise the ER on effectiveness of proposed remedial measures.

5. Check implementation of remedial measures.

1. Notify Contractor

2. Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented

1. Amend working methods

2. Rectify damage and undertake any necessary replacement

Repeated Non- conformity

1. Identify Source

2. Inform the IC(E) and the ER

3. Increase monitoring frequency

4. Discuss remedial actions with the IC(E), the ER and the Contractor

5. Monitor remedial actions until rectification has been completed

6. If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring

1. Check monitoring report

2. Check the Contractor's working method

3. Discuss with the ES and the Contractor on possible remedial measures

4. Advise the ER on effectiveness of proposed remedial measures

5. Supervise implementation of remedial measures.

1. Notify the Contractor

2. Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented

1. Amend working methods

2. Rectify damage and undertake any necessary replacement

Note:

ET – Environmental Specialist, IEC – Independent Environmental Checker, ER – Engineer’s Representative

6 COnclusions

6.1.1.1 The Baseline monitoring has been conducted prior commencement of the construction works of the project in accordance with the EM&A Manual of the TM-CLKL. This Baseline Monitoring Report presents the baseline condition for air quality, ecology, landscape and visual and cultural heritage.

6.1.1.2 Baseline air quality monitoring was conducted by the ET of HyD Contract HY/2012/08 between 17 and 31 October 2013. The monitoring results and established Action and Limit Level for 1-hour TSP and 24-hour TSP would be adopted for this Contract.

6.1.1.3 Baseline survey for Pitcher Plant has been conducted within the project area in September 2013 by a suitably qualified ecologist. During the survey, a total of 280 nos. of individual were identified in Zones 1 to 10 which were in good condition. Moreover, an initial survey for Pitcher Plant by the Contract HY/2013/12 was conducted in mid-September 2014 to confirm the number of existing Pitcher Plant. A total of 280 nos. of individual Pitcher Plant located at Zone 1 to 7 was identified. Since they are occurring on the rocky slope habitat which will be impacted by the proposed slope works (Zone 1 to 7), transplantation is required to minimize impacts to the population.

6.1.1.4 Initial tree survey and photographic record for existing Landscape was conducted on 22 September 2014 for TM-CLKL prior commencement of the project.

6.1.1.5 Condition survey for the Grave G1 was conducted on 23 September 2014. The grave was generally in good condition. However, a total of 10 cracks ranged from hairline to 2.8mm were identified in the cement rendering and mortar of bricks of the grave.




			Job No.: TCS00715/14

			Tuen Mun - Chek Lap Kok Link Contract No. HY/2013/12 – Northern Connection Toll Plaza and Associated Works

			Baseline Monitoring Report (Rev.03)

			Prepared For CRBC and Kaden Joint Venture

EVENT	ACTION
EVENT	ET⁽¹⁾	IEC⁽¹⁾	SOR⁽¹⁾	Contractor(s)
*Action Level*
Exceedance recorded	1 Identify the source. 2 Repeat measurements to confirm findings. If two consecutive measurements exceed Action Level, the exceedance is then confirmed. 3 Inform the IEC, SOR and the Contractor. 4 Investigate the cause of exceedance and check Contractor’s working procedures to determine possible mitigation to be implemented. 5 If the exceedance is confirmed to be Project related after investigation, increase monitoring frequency to daily. 6 Discuss with the IEC and the Contractor on remedial actions required. 7 If exceedance continues, arrange meeting with the IEC and the SOR. 8 If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring.	1 Check monitoring data submitted by the ET. 2 Check the Contractor’s working method. 3 If the exceedance is confirmed to be Project related after investigation, discuss with the ET and the Contractor on possible remedial measures. 4 Advise the SOR on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures. 5 Supervise implementation of remedial measures.	1 Confirm receipt of notification of failure in writing. 2 Notify the Contractor. 3 Ensure remedial measures properly implemented.	1 Rectify any unacceptable practice. 2 Amend working methods if appropriate 3 If the exceedance is confirmed to be Project related, submit proposals for remedial actions to IEC within 3 working days of notification 4 Implement the agreed proposals 5 Amend proposal if appropriate.
*Limit* *Level*
Exceedance recorded	1. Identify the source. 2. Repeat measurement to confirm finding. If two consecutive measurements exceed Limit Level, the exceedance is then confirmed. 3. Inform the IEC, the SOR, the DEP and the Contractor. 4. Investigate the cause of exceedance and check Contractor’s working procedures to determine possible mitigation to be implemented. 5. If the exceedance is confirmed to be Project related after investigation, increase monitoring frequency to daily. 6. Carry out analysis of the Contractor’s working procedures to determine possible mitigation to be implemented. 7. Arrange meeting with the IEC and the SOR to discuss the remedial actions to be taken. 8. Assess effectiveness of the Contractor’s remedial actions and keep the IEC, the DEP and the SOR informed of the results. 9. If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring.	1 Check monitoring data submitted by the ET. 2 Check Contractor’s working method. 3 If the exceedance is confirmed to be Project related after investigation, discuss with the ET and the Contractor on possible remedial measures. 4 Advise the SOR on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures. 5 Supervise implementation of remedial measures.	1. Confirm receipt of notification of failure in writing. 2. Notify the Contractor. 3. If the exceedance is confirmed to be Project related after investigation, in consultation with the IEC, agree with the Contractor on the remedial measures to be implemented. 4. Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented. 5. If exceedance continues, consider what activity of the work is responsible and instruct the Contractor to stop that activity of work until the exceedance is abated.	1 Take immediate action to avoid further exceedance. 2 If the exceedance is confirmed to be Project related after investigation, submit proposals for remedial actions to IEC within 3 working days of notification. 3 Implement the agreed proposals. 4 Amend proposal if appropriate. 5 Stop the relevant activity of works as determined by the SOR until the exceedance is abated.