7.1
A total of 180 hours and 51 minutes were spent
during the 30 days of theodolite tracking effort at Sham
Wat Station (Figure
6) to examine dolphin movement and behaviour from
7.2
Dolphins were successfully tracked from shore on
15 of 30 days of effort, and a total of 89 dolphin groups were tracked. In addition, 12 dolphin group tracks on
six days of successful tracking between April 2011 and August 2012 (collected
by HKCRP outside the baseline monitoring period) was included in the data
analysis to augment the data set.
These historical data were collected in the same manner as those
collected in the 30-day baseline period, and the pooling of both sets of data
can increase the sample size for statistical analysis during the baseline phase
and is beneficial to understand and quantify any responses during construction.
7.3
Major
findings from the analysis of the above data are summarized as follows:
· Dolphin
behaviour and movement change dependent upon natural
(time of day, size of group) and anthropogenic (vessel presence) factors
· Dolphins
swim faster along a straighter path and breathe less frequently when multiple
vessels are present at one time than when no vessels are present. This can be understood as a single
snapshot in time: if there are more boats present when the snapshot is taken,
the dolphins are likely to be swimming faster.
· As
the number and variety of vessels encountered during a track increases,
dolphins swim slower, make more turns, and breathe more frequently. This can be understood as a longer
period of time instead of a snapshot moment: as the sum total of boats that
interact with the dolphins increase over time, the dolphins swim more slowly.
· Dolphins
change aspects of their behaviours relative to
vessels
· Dolphins
are more likely to feed in the presence of fishing vessels. If feeding behaviour
is assisted by vessel presence (particularly the presence of fishing vessels),
it is possible that the presence of multiple vessels inhibits this process.
· It
is possible that vessel noise from multiple vessels exceeds a threshold
tolerance level for the dolphins, and bored piling and related vessel activity
during construction has the potential to have the same effect.
·
The numerical summary of the monitoring results
is presented in Tables 7.1 and 7.2.
Table 7.1 Values
of all response variables in the presence and absence of vessels by time of
day, size of group, and maximum number of vessels present
|
Speed
(km/hr) |
Reorientation
rate (degrees/surfacing) |
Linearity |
Inter-breath interval (sec) |
Vessels absent |
3.60 |
50.3 |
0.618 |
51.2 |
Morning |
3.46 |
45.4 |
0.676 |
53.9 |
Afternoon |
3.80 |
57.2 |
0.536 |
47.3 |
Individual |
3.39 |
46.9 |
0.733 |
57.2 |
Group |
3.91 |
55.2 |
0.455 |
42.6 |
Vessels present |
3.77 |
50.5 |
0.577 |
43.3 |
Morning |
3.74 |
49.9 |
0.606 |
45.0 |
Afternoon |
3.93 |
52.7 |
0.454 |
36.2 |
Individual |
3.42 |
50.8 |
0.542 |
45.0 |
Group |
4.26 |
50.0 |
0.625 |
41.1 |
1 vessel |
3.91 |
48.8 |
0.572 |
36.9 |
2 vessels |
3.74 |
55.8 |
0.559 |
53.6 |
3 vessels |
4.26 |
45.8 |
0.689 |
62.5 |
Table 7.2 Proportion
of time spent in each behavioural state in the
absence and presence of vessels within 500 m
Behavioural
state |
Vessels absent |
Vessels
present |
z-value |
p-value |
Feeding |
0.23 |
0.44 |
-2.882 |
0.004 |
Milling |
0.20 |
0.21 |
-0.164 |
0.870 |
Resting |
0.08 |
0.03 |
1.593 |
0.111 |
Travelling |
0.48 |
0.32 |
2.202 |
0.028 |
Results and significance of the z-test for two proportions indicate if
behaviour significantly changes when vessels are present. Significant differences are indicated by
bold text.
Event and Action Plan
7.4
It is proposed to take all baseline data into
account, including times with no apparent anthropogenic activities near the
dolphins, various vessel activities, and time of day and other variables for
formulating the Action and Limit Levels of the Event and Action Plan:
· Departures
of any the response variables between baseline and construction phases with a
20% difference should trigger the Action Level.
· Departures
of any of the response variables between baseline and construction phases with
a 40% difference should trigger the Limit Level and immediate action will be
required. Such evaluation should be conducted shortly after the 30-day
construction monitoring period.
·
The
abovementioned percentage reduction approach to set the Action and Limit Levels
has taken into consideration of the influencing factors (e.g. time of the day,
group size, vessel activities) that may affect the baseline condition on
dolphin movement and behaviour.
·
The detailed Event and Action Plan is presented
in Table 7.3.
Table 7.3 Event
and Action Plan on Dolphin Movement and Behaviour
EVENT |
ACTION |
|||
ET Leader |
IEC |
SO |
Contractor |
|
Action Level With the numerical values presented in Tables 7.1-7.2, any of the
response variable for dolphin movement patterns (speed, inter-breath
interval, reorientation rate & linearity) and behaviour
(proportion of time spent in each behavioural
state) recorded in the construction phase monitoring is 20% higher or lower than that recorded in the baseline
monitoring, action level should be triggered |
1. Repeat statistical
data analysis to confirm findings; 2. Review all
available and relevant data to ascertain if differences are as a result of
natural variation or seasonal differences; 3. Identify source(s) of impact; 4. Inform the IEC, SO
and Contractor; 5. Check monitoring data; 6. Carry out audit to
ensure all dolphin protective measures are implemented fully and additional
measures be proposed if necessary |
1. Check monitoring
data submitted by ET and Contractor; 2. Discuss monitoring
with the ET and the Contractor; |
1. Discuss with the
IEC the repeat monitoring and any other measures proposed by the ET; 2. Make agreement on
measures to be implemented. |
1. Inform the SO and
confirm notification of the non- compliance in writing; 2. Discuss with the
ET and the IEC and propose measures to the IEC and the SO; 3. Implement the
agreed measures. |
Limit Level With the numerical values presented in Tables 7.1-7.2, any of the
response variable for dolphin movement patterns (speed, inter-breath
interval, reorientation rate & linearity) and behaviour
(proportion of time spent in each behavioural
state) recorded in the construction phase monitoring is 40% higher or lower than that recorded in the baseline
monitoring, limit level should be triggered |
1. Repeat statistical
data analysis to confirm findings; 2. Review all
available and relevant data to ascertain if differences are as a result of
natural variation or seasonal differences; 3. Identify source(s) of impact; 4. Inform the IEC, SO
and Contractor; 5. Check monitoring data; 6. Carry out audit to
ensure all dolphin protective measures are implemented fully and additional
measures be proposed if necessary 7. Discuss additional
dolphin monitoring and any other potential mitigation measures (e.g. consider
to temporarily stop relevant portion of construction activity) with the IEC
and Contractor. |
1. Check monitoring
data submitted by ET and Contractor; 2. Discuss monitoring
with the ET and the Contractor; 3. Review proposals
for additional monitoring and any other measures submitted by the Contractor
and advise ER accordingly. |
1. Discuss with the
IEC the repeat monitoring and any other measures proposed by the ET; 2. Make agreement on
measures to be implemented. |
1. Inform the SO and
confirm notification of the non- compliance in writing; 2. Discuss with the
ET and the IEC and propose measures to the IEC and the SO; 3. Implement the
agreed measures. |
Abbreviations:
ET – Environmental Team, IEC – Independent Environmental Checker, SO –
Supervising Officer
7.5
Detailed methodology, results and discussion can
be found in the Land-based Dolphin Behaviour and
Movement Monitoring Baseline Monitoring Report in Appendix F.